A place for me to save and share examples of legal research quirks and answers to common questions.
Statutes at Large and U.S. Code conflict
“In cases, like this, where the two versions conflict, the rule is that the Statutes at Large version controls.” Midland Power Co-op. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Com’n, 774 F.3d 1, at 3 (D.C. Cir 2014) (finding discrepancy between 16 U.S.C. 825l(b) & 49 Stat. 860).
Torture Victim Protection Act, 28 U.S.C. 1350 Note (2016).
Sergei Magnitsky Rule of Law Accountability Act of 2012, 22 U.S.C. 5811 (2016).
Read more about what a statutory note is and their authority.
Permanent Resident Status for Richi James Lesley, Pvt. L. 108-3, 118 Stat. 4026 (2004).
Note: The DREAM Act was first a private law for Tereza Lee and was morphed into a larger bill after more people asked Sen. Durbin for help.
Positive Law Codification Bill Enacted as Public Law
Enactment of Title 51 – National and Commercial Space Programs
Congressional Record Date Mismatch
The Senate voted to change cloture rules on April 6, 2017. However, since this was an extension of activities calendared for April 4, 2017, it was filed in the daily under April 4, 2017. 163 Cong. S-2383 (2017). To find the pages, you’d have to reference the Daily Digest for April 6, 2017, which would point you to the appropriate pages in No. 58 pt. III.
Committee Report Not Considered
“Putting the legislative history aside, we see virtually no support for respondents’ position. Under these circumstances, where everything other than the legislative history overwhelming suggests that expert fees may not be recovered, the legislative history is simply not enough.” Arlington Cent. Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ. v. Murphy, 548 U.S. 291, 304 (2006).
Overturned Statute Still on the Books
18 U.S.C.A. § 700
“Punishing desecration of the flag dilutes the very freedom that makes this emblem so revered, and worth revering.”
United States v. Eichman, 496 U.S. 310, 319 (1990).
Partially Still Good Law
Schroeder v. Fageol Motors, Inc., 86 Wash. 2d 256 (1975).
Still cited for its definition of unconscionability but distinguished as to how summary judgment applies to cases of unconscionability.
“[T]he apparent prohibition in Schroeder against summary judgment proceedings where unconscionability is claimed is not universally accepted. It is true that some courts have followed the rule stated in Schroeder. . . . Others, however, have concluded that under the U.C.C. unconscionability may be decided on summary judgment.”
Nelson v. McGoldrick, 127 Wn.2d 124, 132 (1995).
Note: Shepard’s picks up a distinguishing case that KeyCite does not: Torgerson v. One Lincoln Tower, LLC, 166 Wn.2d 510, 210 P.3d 318 (2009).
This page constantly under construction. If you have suggested additions email them to me.